Porter Generic Strategies
and sustainable competitive advantage

Porter generic strategies are options for the way a business will compete. These choices focus on what it takes a firm to sustain a competitive edge over the rivals in its industry.


Where are we in the strategic planning process?


We are at the stage of devising strategies. These address the strategic issues found in the previous target setting, and SWOT analysis stages.


Harvard Professor Michael E. Porter first explained the Porter generic strategies in his Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance.

A sustainable competitive advantage is something, which enables a firm to reach a higher long-term average profitability than its competitors. Unlike short-term advantages, such as first access to resources, or new markets, a sustainable competitive advantage is such an integral part of the firm’s operations that it is difficult for rivals to duplicate in the short term.

The generic strategies are choices from among the options on two dimensions.

The first is the scope of the target market.

Second is the way in which the firm will compete over its rivals.

Three options for Porter generic strategies

This simple diagram illustrates these options.

In one dimension, Porter strategies derive from two basic types of competitive advantage: cost leadership, and product or service differentiation.

These two basic kinds of competitive advantage, matched with the market scope of the activities open to an enterprise, lead to just three strategies: cost leadership, differentiation, and focus.

Cost leadership

The first of the generic strategies is cost leadership. It is almost self evident that this involves the business aiming to be the lowest cost producer, in its chosen industry segment. It becomes almost fanatical in its pursuit of cost efficiencies in all areas of the firm’s operations.

However, a cost leader must maintain a minimum level of quality, acceptable to the customer, and not too far away from industry standards, while being price competitive.

Differentiation

The second of the Porter strategies is product or service differentiation. With this strategy, a business strives to be the highest value provider in its industry segment in something other than cost. This aspect of the product or service offering must be something that many customers highly value. In addition, the firm must present it and the offering to meet those needs more effectively than would-be rivals must. Its unique position in the mind of the customer will then create the possibility of being able to charge a higher price with resulting higher profitability for the company. Naturally, the company will also have to stay close to industry levels of cost management to be able to harvest these extra or premium profits.

In contrast with cost leadership, more than one firm can employ successful differentiation strategies in the same industry segment, such as the luxury car market.

Focus

The third of the Porter strategies is focusing on a very specific market niche. This means creating a strategy precisely to meet the needs of a sharply defined market segment. Such a focused firm builds success on serving its niche, without necessarily being a leader in either cost management or product differentiation.

Choosing among Porter generic strategies

Each of the generic strategies is a separate and distinct choice of basis for competing. Each probably requires as different mindset, resources, and general management approach.

Porter recommends that firms choose one approach, and dedicate themselves to doing it as effectively and efficiently as possible. This is hard to achieve consistently. Trying to implement a cost leadership approach, while also striving to be a high value differentiator, is almost impossible for any enterprise.

Porter strategies avoid compromise at some midpoint among the options. This ‘stuck in the middle’ strategy is as helpful as walking down the middle of a busy two-lane highway!

For a critique of the wide adoption of the Porter generic strategies framework see -

Product Differentiation in the Market for Antibodies: Novel Statistical Approach to Quantify Micheal Porter's Generic Strategies Model

Also, see Blue Ocean Strategy elsewhere on this site.

Return from Porter Generic Strategies to Business Strategy.

Return from Porter Generic Strategies to Simply Strategic Planning Home Page.



Catch me at Trafeze

Sign up for our Newsletter -
StratXtra

Enter Your E-mail Address
Enter Your First Name
Then

Don't worry — your e-mail address is totally secure.
I promise to use it only to send you StratXtra.

StratXtra provides updates on what is happening here at the website, and comment on current issues in strategic planning.


The Argenti Strategic Planning Process can improve the Performance of Your Organization by helping you to find Strategic Elephants!

Argenti Strategic Planning is a process which, for more than forty years, has been used by over 2000 companies and NPOs around the world. Many of them have since become world class performers.

One key lesson from all this experience is that the starting point for a successful strategic plan is categorically not to announce a Mission or Vision Statement. Instead your planning team must move carefully through the ‘Argenti Purpose Sequence©’.
For a free copy, Get Started.

Another key lesson from the Argenti Strategic Planning experience is that, throughout the process, you must avoid being caught in the details. Ignoring this rule can derail your entire planning process. The Argenti Strategic Planning Process shows you how to concentrate like a laser on the ‘The Strategic Elephants’.

See the Executive Tour for a brief description of The Argenti System.